Having a tough time choosing between the SRAM xg 1195 and the SRAM xg 1150? I know it’s a difficult choice but look no further as this detailed guide will help you decide which one to go with.
I’ll cover the pros and cons of both of these cassettes and do a side by side comparison of all the important features like the durability, gear ranges and so on.
Without further ado, LET’S GET STARTED!
Features And Benefits Of The SRAM xg – 1195
The SRAM xg – 1195 is an advanced 12-speed 1x option for mountain bikers. SRAM designed this group to be as durable and as tough as any other offering in the market today. Featuring a 1 x option, the xg – 1195 has everything a mountain bike rider could ask for in their ride.
Also read: Why is my Cassette wobbling?
Consequently, it has several benefits which make it the first choice for the riders. Let’s see what those features are.
- A weight of 500g with a 5% or more light weight than other cassettes in its class.
- Wide 10-42t gear range-a perfect fit for any ride.
- High durability.
- Large 11-42 tooth range.
With its durable JET black finish, the cassette appears as tough as it performs, ride after ride. The corrosion resistance offered by the JET finish is superior.
What We Liked
As a mountain biker, I love the benefits of the SRAM xg – 1195. The shifters are light and available for single, double and triple out closures.
The rear derailleur is compatible with shifting speed, tension or a customized position. It’s fast, sturdy, and great for riders at all levels.
Features And Benefits Of The SRAM xg – 1150
The SRAM XG – 1150 is one of the most impressive and advanced bicycle cassettes that SRAM has created to date. Making use of a monolithic four-arm BB30 crank and Exact Actuation, your shifting will be quick and smooth.
Also read: Disc brakes pulsing
Here are some features to consider:
- Availability of the 11-32 tooth cassette provides maximum versatility for Gravel riders by adding an a-low gear for super steep climbs.
- 1129 cubic centimeters of maximum volume.
- This product is made up of Aluminum material and has a green finish.
- It has been programmed with “Curtis high-speed cable routing”.
It is best known for its Speed Cassette reliability, lightweight, and durable cassette that provides several benefits. The matched cassette and freehub body create an imperceptible shift feel. Compared to the previous generation, the latest updates include broader gear steps for easier shifting when using the wide range.
What We Liked
I find the Sram xg – 1150 set up very easy to use. I love the ability to change the gear ratios on the front derailleur on the fly, which for me is great for when I’m climbing hills or going down them.
The brakes are super responsive, and I especially love how you can release huge amounts of brake power with little pressure alone. If you’re looking for improved gear ratios and perfect incremental shifting, then give this product a try!
SRAM xg 1195 vs 1150
The newly-announced SRAM xg – 1195 group is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, the xg – 1150. Because SRAM wants to keep the weight approximately the same as the older 1150 (272g), they’ve made changes to an already excellent group.
Listed below are several distinctions between SRAM xg 1195 vs 1150:
SRAM XG-1195 only works with 29″ wheels while SRAM XG-1150 works with all-wheel sizes including 27.5″, 26″, 24″, 22″ and 19″.
SRAM xg -1195 has a new carbon cage, which is lighter than the aluminum one in SRAM xg -1150. In addition, the new carbon cage has been redesigned to allow for faster and easier shifting.
1150 comes in at $1,799 / £1,599 / AU$2,999. 1195 comes in at $1,999 / £1,699 / AU$3,999.
The XG-1195 has 11 cogs, while the XG-1150 has 10. 1150 has a smaller range than 1195, but it’s more widely compatible with more drivetrains.
The main difference between these two products is the number of gears they offer – the SRAM XG-1195 has 12 speeds while the SRAM 1150 only has 11 speeds.
The XG -1150 used a conventional steel spline between each cog, whereas the new XG -1195 uses a carbon fiber insert instead of steel to give it a softer feel under load. This design change will also help keep things quiet over time since there’s less metal-on-metal contact between cogs.
Overall, the results are consistent, with the performance enhancements falling into a specific range based on the equipment being compared. The total performance difference between SRAM xg 1195 and SRAM 1150 is 0.5-inches – a tenth of an inch per pound (plus or minus) depending on which bikes and wheels are being considered.
Based on that information, riders looking to shave weight off their existing carbon wheelsets may find SRAM xg – 1195 to be an attractive option given its smaller weight penalty. However, for all other applications, SRAM 1150 is a viable alternative and one that delivers a comparable performance edge in key areas over SRAM xg – 1195.